GF Haddad states Shah Ismail is free of blame on the issue of Sarf Himmah


wa `alaykum salam,
Those who painstakingly gathered and translated the apologetic evidence in defense of Shah Ismail deserve credit because they have brought to light material from the sources that was unavailable before, and my feeling is they have tried to be fair in their translations. After a quick perusal of a few issues I am satisfied that on the one hand Shah Ismail is blameless on the issue of sarf al himma, but not on that of ‘mixing with the earth’ despite Mawlana Gangohi’s attempt to make it sound acceptable to use an ambiguous expression. Prophetic Attributes are tawqifi and here as elsewhere we stand with athar. Nor is Shah Ismail’s position that more Muhammads can be created other than tanqis of Prophet posing as ta’zim of Allah Most High. Those who ask for such discussions must therefore sift the chaff from the good and give each its due. In the end we repeat it is best to leave it alone, make peace, worship Allah and bless the Prophet.

Hajj Gibril Haddad

http://eshaykh.com/doctrine/deobandi-explanation-of-controversial-passages/

As stated by the Raza Khanis, each and every accusation they hurled at Shah Ismail contained “kufr” so we ask the Barelwis: will you declare GF Haddad a deviant for his defense of Shah Ismail on the sarf-e himmat issue? The lie that thinking about the Prophet is worse than thinking about a donkey can be read on every Barelwi website and heard in every Barelwi mosque. Oh Barelwis! Do you not fear Allah!

Advertisements

One Response to GF Haddad states Shah Ismail is free of blame on the issue of Sarf Himmah

  1. Yaseen says:

    “Raza Khanis” aside for a while, do you consider GF Haddad as a deviant or a Sunni, specially knowing that his sheikh Nazim Al-Qubrusi is a quack who believes George Bush Jr. and Tony Blair are awliya

    http://eshaykh.com/uncategorized/george-bush-and-tony-blair/

    What do you think of Hisham Kabbani and Nazim Al-Qubrusi knowing that Nazim reverently kisses the pope, and lets his mureeds kiss the pope’s hands?

    What do you have to say about GF Haddad’s blind defense of Nazim Al-Qubrusi?

    Is the behavior of Nazim Al-Qubrusi and GF Haddad’s blind defense of this quack sheikh something you consider to be mainstream Ahlus Sunnah?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: