Barelwi Takfir of Ml. Rashid Ahmad Gangohi

One of the distinguishing features of the Barelwi sect is that they consider the Deobandi scholars as unbelievers. Four Deobandi scholars were explicitly named by Ahmad Raza Khan and declared unbelievers for different reasons.

Mawlana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi was declared an unbeliever, because according to Ahmad Raza Khan, he supposingly said in a fatwa that Allah had already lied (and we seek refuge with Allah from such words).

Our question for the Barelwis remains:

– Can you find any original manuscript were this statement can be found?

The opposite can be found in Fatawa Rashidiyya clearly stating that such a person who holds this believe, is certainly an unbeliever.

Before any of the Barelwis want to discuss intricate discussion on imkan al-kadhib, they should first acknowledge that their big leader Ahmad Raza Khan lied against Mawlana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi, or at least was severely mistaken in his accusation against Mawlana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi.

We recommend every person who wants to highlight the fraud of the Barelwi sect, to bring up this point first in order to show the swindle of the Barelwis.

Do NOT move forward to the discussion of Imkan al-Kadhib, but rather first highlight the fabricated fatwa mentioned by Alahazrat, and let them accept this point first. Then we can move on.

3 Responses to Barelwi Takfir of Ml. Rashid Ahmad Gangohi

  1. waqar says:

    Read Tamheed ul Iman and see what Alahazrat says about this ‘fraudulent’ copy and how it was widely circulated and maulana Raheed Ahmad Gangohi knew about it but did not reply. now you prove that al-muhanad is a direct refutation of husssam al- haramayn beacuse where is al muhanad do the arab ulema take back the original fatwa. finally comapre al- muhanad to the teachings of rasheed ahmad Gangohi and you will find blatant contradictions.

  2. waqar says:

    i know my comment is awaiting moderation will be soon to be removed like how you craftly remove the charges on your elders. haq will prevail over batil and truth will crush falsehood.

    • Person says:

      1. Both your comments are here.
      2. 45 ulema of the greatest ulema on the face of the Earth at that point signed it.
      3. One of the lies against the great scholars of deoband(R.A) are falsely attributed( meaning he said something was in the book, but wasn’t), GF Haddad said about that “I do not remember reading the above in my English Bashishti Zewar and I doubt that Ashraf `Ali al-Tahanawi said that to celebrate mawlid or visit the graves is shirk. As for seeking help apart from Allah it is shirk whether from the living or the dead.
      Ashraf `Ali al-Tahanawi wrote a treatise entitled “Nayl al-Shifa’ bi Na`l al-Mustafa” (Obtaining remedy through the sandals of the Elect One) found in his book Zad al-Sa`id (Provision for the fortunate). The muhaddith of India Shaykh Muhammad Zakariyya Kandihlawi said in his English translation of al-Tirmidhi’s Shama’il:
      “Maulana Ashraf `Ali Thanwi Sahib has written in his book Zaadus Sa`eed a detailed treatise on the barakat and virtues of the shoes of Rasulullah Sallallahu `Alayhi Wasallam. Those interested in this should read that book (which is available in English). In short, it may be said that it [the Prophet’s sandal] has countless qualities. The `ulama have experienced it many a time. One is blessed by seeing Rasulullah Sallallahu `Alayhi Wasallam in one’s dreams; one gains safety from oppressors and every heartfelt desire is attained. Every object is fulfilled by its tawassul (means, petition, request). The method of tawassul is also mentioned therein.”
      4. Al Muhannad al al Mufannad is aqaid ulema e Deoband. Raza khan (may Allah give him and his hardcore followers what they deserve) edited the text of the ulema in his hussamal haramain, it’s someone on this site IIRC, that a scholar of Africa meet Shaykul hind(r), and said raza khan edited his fatwa on the deobandi scholars
      5. The scholars of the haramain don’t speak urdu, at least most of them.
      14 ulema retract position in Hussumal haramain
      7. Check out this for tamheed
      8. Raza didn’t respond after the deobandi scholars refuted him in Al muhannad even though he had 12 years to do so.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: